Imaging lens

ABSTRACT

There is provided an imaging lens with excellent optical characteristics which satisfies demand of a low profile and a low F-number. An imaging lens comprises in order from an object side to an image side, a first lens with positive refractive power, a second lens with negative refractive power, a third lens with positive or negative refractive power, a fourth lens with negative refractive power, a fifth lens with positive refractive power, and a sixth lens with negative refractive power, wherein said first lens is formed in a meniscus shape having an object-side surface being convex in a paraxial region, said second lens has an object-side surface being convex in a paraxial region, said sixth lens has an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region, and the predetermined conditional expressions are satisfied.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an imaging lens which forms an image of an object on a solid-state image sensor such as a CCD sensor or a C-MOS sensor used in an imaging device.

Description of the Related Art

In recent years, it becomes common that camera function is mounted in various products, such as information terminal equipment, home appliances, automobiles, and the like. Development of products with the camera function will be made accordingly.

The imaging lens mounted in such equipment is required to be compact and to have high-resolution performance.

As a conventional imaging lens aiming high performance, for example, the imaging lens disclosed in the following Patent Document 1 has been known.

Patent Document 1 (CN107966793A) discloses an imaging lens comprising, in order from an object side: a first lens; a second lens with positive refractive power; a third lens with negative refractive power; a fourth lens; a fifth lens; and a sixth lens; wherein a relationship between a focal length of the overall optical system and a focal length of the first lens, and a relationship among an abbe number of the second lens, a thickness along an optical axis of the second lens, and a total track length satisfy certain conditions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

However, in lens configurations disclosed in the Patent Document 1, when a low profile and a low F-number are to be realized, it is very difficult to correct aberrations at a peripheral area, and excellent optical performance can not be obtained.

The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide an imaging lens with high resolution which satisfies demand of the low profile and the low F-number in well balance and excellently corrects aberrations.

Regarding terms used in the present invention, “a convex surface (a surface being convex)”, “a concave surface (a surface being concave)” or “a flat surface (a surface being flat)” of lens surfaces implies a shape of the lens surface in a paraxial region (near the optical axis).

“Refractive power” implies the refractive power in a paraxial region. “A pole point” implies an off-axial point on an aspheric surface at which a tangential plane intersects the optical axis perpendicularly. “A total track length” is defined as a distance along the optical axis from an object-side surface of an optical element located closest to the object to an image plane. “The total track length” and “a back focus” is a distance obtained when thickness of an IR cut filter or a cover glass which may be arranged between the imaging lens and the image plane is converted into an air-converted distance.

An imaging lens according to the present invention comprises, in order from an object side to an image side; a first lens with positive refractive power; a second lens with negative refractive power; a third lens with positive or negative refractive power; a fourth lens with negative refractive power; a fifth lens with positive refractive power; and a sixth lens with negative refractive power; wherein said first lens is formed in a meniscus shape having an object-side surface being convex in a paraxial region, said second lens has an object-side surface being convex in a paraxial region, and said sixth lens has an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region.

The first lens is formed in the meniscus shape having the object-side surface being convex in the paraxial region, and spherical aberration, coma aberration, astigmatism, field curvature, and distortion are properly suppressed.

The second lens properly corrects chromatic aberration by having the negative refractive power. Furthermore, when the second lens has the object-side surface being convex in the paraxial region, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are properly corrected.

The third lens has the positive or the negative refractive power. When the third lens has the positive refractive power, the spherical aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are properly corrected. On the other hand, when the third lens has the negative refractive power, the chromatic aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are properly corrected. Additionally, when at least one aspheric surface is formed, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are more properly corrected.

The fourth lens has the negative refractive power, and the chromatic aberration, the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are properly corrected.

The fifth lens has the positive refractive power, and achieves reduction in a profile and properly corrects the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion.

The sixth lens has the negative refractive power, forms at least one aspheric surface, and properly corrects the chromatic aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion. Furthermore, the sixth lens has the image-side surface being concave in the paraxial region, maintains the low profile, and secures a back focus.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the sixth lens has an object-side surface being concave in the paraxial region.

When the object-side surface of the sixth lens is concave in the paraxial region, a light ray incident angle to the sixth lens is appropriately controlled, and the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the image-side surface of the sixth lens is formed as an aspheric surface having at least one pole point in a position off the optical axis.

When the image-side surface of the sixth lens is formed as the aspheric surface having at least one pole point in the position off the optical axis, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are more properly corrected.

The imaging lens according to the present invention, due to the above-mentioned configuration, achieves a low profile which a ratio of a total track length to a diagonal length of an effective image area of the image sensor is 0.7 or less and a low F number of 2.0 or less.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (1) is satisfied:

f4/f<−13.00  (1)

where

f4: a focal length of the fourth lens, and

f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.

The conditional expression (1) defines an appropriate range of the focal length of the fourth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (1), the chromatic aberration, the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (2) is satisfied:

0.10<(r6/|f3|)×100<55.00  (2)

where

r6: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the third lens, and

f3: a focal length of the third lens.

The conditional expression (2) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens and the focal length of the third lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (2), the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (3) is satisfied:

7.50<r7/T3<20.00  (3)

where

r7: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the fourth lens, and

T3: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the third lens to an object-side surface of the fourth lens.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (4) is satisfied:

33.00<νd3<79.00  (4)

where

νd3: an abbe number at d-ray of the third lens.

The conditional expression (4) defines an appropriate range of the abbe number at d-ray of the third lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (4), the chromatic aberration can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (5) is satisfied:

0.50<r2/f1<1.50  (5)

where

r2: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the first lens, and

f1: a focal length of the first lens.

The conditional expression (5) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the first lens and the focal length of the first lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (5), reduction in the profile can be achieved, and the spherical aberration, the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (6) is satisfied:

0.20<r3/r4<2.00  (6)

where

r3: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the second lens, and

r4: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the second lens.

The conditional expression (6) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the second lens and the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the second lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (6), the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (7) is satisfied:

|r9|/r10<−8.40  (7)

where

r9: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the fifth lens, and

r10: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the fifth lens.

The conditional expression (7) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the fifth lens and the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the fifth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (7), the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (8) is satisfied:

0.20<r8/f<1.20  (8)

where

r8: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the fourth lens, and

f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.

The conditional expression (8) defines an appropriate range of the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the fourth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (8), the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (9) is satisfied:

8.50<|f3|/f  (9)

where

f3: a focal length of the third lens, and

f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.

The conditional expression (9) defines an appropriate range of the focal length of the third lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (9), the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (10) is satisfied:

−10.00<|f3|/f4<−0.30  (10)

where

f3: a focal length of the third lens, and

f4: a focal length of the fourth lens.

The conditional expression (10) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the focal length of the third lens and the focal length of the fourth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (10), the chromatic aberration, the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (11) is satisfied:

0.10<r2/r6<0.45  (11)

where

r2: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the first lens, and

r6: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the third lens.

The conditional expression (11) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the first lens and the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (11), the astigmatism, the field curvature and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (12) is satisfied:

−0.70<r3/f2<−0.25  (12)

where

r3: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the second lens, and

f2: a focal length of the second lens.

The conditional expression (12) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the second lens and the focal length of the second lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (12), the chromatic aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (13) is satisfied:

2.20<r5/f<4.50  (13)

where

r5: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the third lens, and

f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.

The conditional expression (13) defines an appropriate range of the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the third lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (13), the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (14) is satisfied:

2.50<r6/r7<5.50  (14)

where

r6: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the third lens, and

r7: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the fourth lens.

The conditional expression (14) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens and the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the fourth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (14), the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (15) is satisfied:

−3.40<r6/r11<−0.50  (15)

where

r6: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the third lens, and

r11: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the sixth lens.

The conditional expression (15) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens and the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the sixth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (15), the astigmatism, the field curvature and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (16) is satisfied:

6.75<r6/r12<22.00  (16)

where

r6: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the third lens, and

r12: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the sixth lens.

The conditional expression (16) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens and the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the sixth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (16), the astigmatism, the field curvature and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (17) is satisfied:

22.00<r6/T3<90.00  (17)

where

r6: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the third lens, and

T3: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the third lens to an object-side surface of the fourth lens.

The conditional expression (17) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens and the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the third lens to the object-side surface of the fourth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (17), reduction in the profile can be achieved, and the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (18) is satisfied:

15.00<r6/(T2+D3)<45.00  (18)

where r6: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the third lens, T2: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the second lens to an object-side surface of the third lens, and

D3: a thickness along the optical axis of the third lens.

The conditional expression (18) defines an appropriate range of a relationship among the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens, the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the second lens to the object-side surface of the third lens, and the thickness along the optical axis of the third lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (18), reduction in the profile can be achieved, and the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (19) is satisfied:

7.00<r8/T3<18.50  (19)

where

r8: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the fourth lens, and

T3: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the third lens to an object-side surface of the fourth lens.

The conditional expression (19) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the fourth lens and the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the third lens to the object-side surface of the fourth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (19), reduction in the profile can be achieved, and the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (20) is satisfied:

−1.10<r8/r11<−0.20  (20)

where

r8: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the fourth lens, and

r11: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the sixth lens.

The conditional expression (20) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the fourth lens and the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the sixth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (20), the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (21) is satisfied:

2.65<|r9|/f<35.00  (21)

where

r9: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the fifth lens, and

f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.

The conditional expression (21) defines an appropriate range of the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the fifth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (21), the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (22) is satisfied:

−9.50<r11/r12<−3.00  (22)

where

r11: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the sixth lens, and

r12: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the sixth lens.

The conditional expression (22) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the sixth lens and the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the sixth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (22), the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (23) is satisfied:

1.90<r11/f6<6.00  (23)

where

r11: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the sixth lens, and

f6: a focal length of the sixth lens.

The conditional expression (23) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the sixth lens and the focal length of the sixth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (23), the chromatic aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (24) is satisfied:

−21.00<r11/(T4+T5)<−7.00  (24)

where

r11: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the sixth lens,

T4: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the fourth lens to an object-side surface of the fifth lens, and

T5: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the fifth lens to an object-side surface of the sixth lens.

The conditional expression (24) defines an appropriate range of a relationship among the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the sixth lens, the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the fourth lens to the object-side surface of the fifth lens, and the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the fifth lens to the object-side surface of the sixth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (24), reduction in the profile can be achieved, and the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion can be properly corrected.

Effect of Invention

According to the present invention, there can be provided an imaging lens with high resolution which satisfies demand of the low profile and the low F-number in well balance, and properly corrects aberrations.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing an imaging lens in Example 1 according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of the imaging lens in Example 1 according to the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a schematic view showing an imaging lens in Example 2 according to the present invention.

FIG. 4 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of the imaging lens in Example 2 according to the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing an imaging lens in Example 3 according to the present invention.

FIG. 6 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of the imaging lens in Example 3 according to the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a schematic view showing an imaging lens in Example 4 according to the present invention.

FIG. 8 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of the imaging lens in Example 4 according to the present invention.

FIG. 9 is a schematic view showing an imaging lens in Example 5 according to the present invention.

FIG. 10 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of the imaging lens in Example 5 according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Hereinafter, the preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail referring to the accompanying drawings.

FIGS. 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 are schematic views of the imaging lenses in Examples 1 to 5 according to the embodiments of the present invention, respectively.

The imaging lens according to the present invention comprises, in order from an object side to an image side; a first lens L1 with positive refractive power; a second lens L2 with negative refractive power; a third lens L3 with positive or negative refractive power; a fourth lens L4 with negative refractive power; a fifth lens L5 with positive refractive power; and a sixth lens L6 with negative refractive power; wherein said first lens L1 is formed in a meniscus shape having an object-side surface being convex in a paraxial region, said second lens L2 has an object-side surface being convex in a paraxial region, and said sixth lens L6 has an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region.

A filter IR such as an IR cut filter or a cover glass is arranged between the sixth lens L6 and an image plane IMG (namely, the image plane of an image sensor). The filter IR is omissible.

By arranging an aperture stop ST on the object side of the first lens L1, correction of aberrations and control of an incident angle of the light ray of high image height to an image sensor become facilitated.

The first lens L1 has the positive refractive power and is formed in a meniscus shape having the object-side surface being convex and an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region (near the optical axis X). Therefore, spherical aberration, coma aberration, astigmatism, field curvature, and distortion are suppressed.

The second lens L2 has the negative refractive power and is formed in a meniscus shape having the object-side surface being convex and an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region (near the optical axis X). Therefore, chromatic aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are properly corrected.

The third lens L3 has the positive refractive power and is formed in a meniscus shape having an object-side surface being convex and an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region (near the optical axis X). Therefore, the spherical aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are properly corrected.

The refractive power of the third lens L3 may be negative as in Example 2 shown in FIG. 3. In this case, the third lens L3 is favorable for correction of the chromatic aberration.

The fourth lens L4 has the negative refractive power and is formed in a meniscus shape having an object-side surface being convex and an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region (near the optical axis X). Therefore, the chromatic aberration, the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are properly corrected.

The fifth lens L5 has the positive refractive power and is formed in a meniscus shape having an object-side surface being concave and an image-side surface being convex in a paraxial region (near the optical axis X). Therefore, a light ray incident angle to the fifth lens L5 is appropriately controlled, and the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and distortion are properly corrected.

The fifth lens L5 may be formed in a biconvex shape having the object-side surface being convex and the image-side surface being convex in the paraxial region as in Example 10 shown in FIG. 9. In this case, the fifth lens L5 achieves reduction in a profile by the positive refractive powers on both sides, and is favorable for correction of the astigmatism and the distortion.

The sixth lens L6 has the negative refractive power and is formed in a biconcave shape having an object-side surface being concave and the image-side surface being concave in the paraxial region. Therefore, the chromatic aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are properly corrected. Furthermore, the sixth lens L6 maintains a low profile and secures a back focus by having the image-side surface being concave in the paraxial region.

The image-side surface of the sixth lens L6 is formed as an aspheric surface having at least one pole point in a position off the optical axis X. Therefore, the astigmatism, the field curvature, and the distortion are more properly corrected.

Regarding the imaging lens according to the present embodiments, it is preferable that all lenses of the first lens L1 to the sixth lens L6 are single lenses. Configuration only with the single lenses can frequently use the aspheric surfaces. In the present embodiments, all lens surfaces are formed as appropriate aspheric surfaces, and the aberrations are properly corrected. Furthermore, in comparison with the case in which a cemented lens is used, workload is reduced, and manufacturing in low cost becomes possible.

Furthermore, the imaging lens according to the present embodiments makes manufacturing facilitated by using a plastic material for the lenses, and mass production in a low cost can be realized.

The material applied to the lens is not limited to the plastic material. By using glass material, further high performance may be aimed. It is preferable that all of lens-surfaces are formed as aspheric surfaces, however, spherical surfaces easy to be manufactured may be adopted in accordance with required performance.

The imaging lens according to the present embodiments shows preferable effect by satisfying the following conditional expressions (1) to (24):

f4/f<−13.00  (1)

0.10<(r6/|f3|)×100<55.00  (2)

7.50<r7/T3<20.00  (3)

33.00<νd3<79.00  (4)

0.50<r2/f1<1.50  (5)

0.20<r3/r4<2.00  (6)

|r9|/r10<−8.40  (7)

0.20<r8/f<1.20  (8)

8.50<|f3|/f  (9)

−10.00<|f3|/f4<−0.30  (10)

0.10<r2/r6<0.45  (11)

−0.70<r3/f2<−0.25  (12)

2.20<r5/f<4.50  (13)

2.50<r6/r7<5.50  (14)

−3.40<r6/r11<−0.50  (15)

6.75<r6/r12<22.00  (16)

22.00<r6/T3<90.00  (17)

15.00<r6/(T2+D3)<45.00  (18)

7.00<r8/T3<18.50  (19)

−1.10<r8/r11<−0.20  (20)

2.65<|r9|/f<35.00  (21)

−9.50<r11/r12<−3.00  (22)

1.90<r11/f6<6.00  (23)

−21.00<r11/(T4+T5)<−7.00  (24)

where

νd3: an abbe number at d-ray of the third lens L3,

D3: a thickness along the optical axis X of the third lens L3,

T2: a distance along the optical axis X from an image-side surface of the second lens L2 to an object-side surface of the third lens L3,

T3: a distance along the optical axis X from an image-side surface of the third lens L3 to an object-side surface of the fourth lens L4,

T4: a distance along the optical axis X from an image-side surface of the fourth lens L4 to an object-side surface of the fifth lens L5,

T5: a distance along the optical axis X from an image-side surface of the fifth lens L5 to an object-side surface of the sixth lens L6,

f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens,

f1: a focal length of the first lens L1,

f2: a focal length of the second lens L2,

f3: a focal length of the third lens L3,

f4: a focal length of the fourth lens L4,

f6: a focal length of the sixth lens L6,

r2: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the first lens L1,

r3: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the second lens L2,

r4: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the second lens L2,

r5: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the third lens L3,

r6: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the third lens L3,

r7: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the fourth lens L4,

r8: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the fourth lens L4,

r9: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the fifth lens L5,

r10: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the fifth lens L5,

r11: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the sixth lens L6, and

r12: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the sixth lens L6.

It is not necessary to satisfy the above all conditional expressions, and by satisfying the conditional expression individually, operational advantage corresponding to each conditional expression can be obtained.

The imaging lens according to the present embodiments shows further preferable effect by satisfying the following conditional expressions (1a) to (24a):

−300.00<f4/f<−15.50  (1a)

0.25<(r6/|f3|)×100<45.00  (2a)

9.00<r7/T3<18.00  (3a)

44.00<νd3<67.00  (4a)

0.75<r2/f1<1.35  (5a)

0.80<r3/r4<1.85  (6a)

−100.00<|r9|/r10<−10.00  (7a)

0.45<r8/f<1.00  (8a)

11.00<|f3|/f<1500.00  (9a)

−8.50<|f3|/f4<−0.55  (10a)

0.15<r2/r6<0.40  (11a)

−0.55<r3/f2<−0.30  (12a)

2.50<r5/f<3.90  (13a)

3.00<r6/r7<4.90  (14a)

−3.00<r6/r11<−1.10  (15a)

8.00<r6/r12<18.00  (16a)

33.50<r6/T3<72.00  (17a)

18.00<r6/(T2+D3)<36.00  (18a)

8.50<r8/T3<16.00  (19a)

−0.90<r8/r11<−0.30  (20a)

3.20<|r9|/f<25.00  (21a)

−7.70<r11/r12<−3.50  (22a)

2.30<r11/f6<4.90  (23a)

−17.00<r11/(T4+T5)<−8.00.  (24a)

The signs in the above conditional expressions have the same meanings as those in the paragraph before the preceding paragraph.

In this embodiment, the aspheric shapes of the aspheric surfaces of the lens are expressed by Equation 1, where Z denotes an axis in the optical axis direction, H denotes a height perpendicular to the optical axis, R denotes a paraxial curvature radius, k denotes a conic constant, and A4, A6, A8, A10, A12, A14, A16, A18 and A20 denote aspheric surface coefficients.

$\begin{matrix} {Z = {\frac{\frac{H^{2}}{R}}{1 + \sqrt{1 - {\left( {k + 1} \right)\frac{H^{2}}{R^{2}}}}} + {A_{4}H^{4}} + {A_{6}H^{6}} + {A_{8}H^{8}} + {A_{10}H^{10}} + {A_{12}H^{12}} + {A_{14}H^{14}} + {A_{16}H^{16}} + {A_{18}H^{18}} + {A_{20}H^{20}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

Next, examples of the imaging lens according to this embodiment will be explained. In each example, f denotes a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens, Fno denotes an F-number, w denotes a half field of view, ih denotes a maximum image height, and TTL denotes a total track length. Additionally, i denotes a surface number counted from the object side, r denotes a paraxial curvature radius, d denotes a distance between lenses along the optical axis (surface distance), Nd denotes a refractive index at d-ray (reference wavelength), and νd denotes an abbe number at d-ray. As for aspheric surfaces, an asterisk (*) is added after surface number i.

Example 1

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Example 1 Unit mm f = 5.53 Fno = 1.90 ω(°) = 42.7 h = 5.16 TTL = 6.43 Surface Data i r d Nd νd (Object) Infinity Infinity 1 (Stop) Infinity −0.5400  2* 2.0282 0.7734 1.544 55.93 (νd1)  3* 5.4468 0.0863  4* 6.2765 0.2900 1.671 19.24 (νd2)  5* 4.1752 0.4318  6* 15.5621 0.4167 1.535 55.69 (νd3)  7* 25.0346 0.4820  8* 5.8322 0.4000 1.639 23.52 (νd4)  9* 5.2173 0.3961 10* −20.5823 0.9520 1.535 55.69 (νd5) 11* −1.7211 0.3683 12* −10.5423 0.5221 1.535 55.69 (νd6) 13* 1.7098 0.5000 14  Infinity 0.2100 1.517 64.20 15  Infinity 0.6712 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data TTL to diagonal length of effective Lens Start Surface Focal Length image area 1 2 5.499 0.62 2 4 −19.683 3 6 75.742 4 8 −103.748 5 10 3.451 6 12 −2.711 Aspheric Surface Data 2nd Surface 3rd Surface 4th Surface 5th Surface 6th Surface 7th Surface k   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00 A4 −2.771393E−02 −5.056457E−02 −8.851514E−02 −3.077377E−02 −1.162800E−02 −7.782280E−02 A6   1.502619E−01 −4.044067E−02   6.581313E−02   3.498363E−02 −2.015362E−01   1.743497E−01 A8 −4.384612E−01   2.434118E−01   3.060641E−02 −6.764146E−02   5.729473E−01 −5.328618E−01 A10   7.711761E−01 −4.750834E−01 −1.227748E−01   3.898884E−01 −9.047213E−01   9.684411E−01 A12 −8.467353E−01   5.510819E−01   1.639568E−01 −9.066317E−01   7.771034E−01 −1.093582E+00 A14   5.839715E−01 −3.986964E−01 −1.290245E−01   1.104430E+00 −3.042757E−01   7.694781E−01 A16 −2.458119E−01   1.743280E−01   6.001583E−02 −7.528307E−01 −1.535008E−02 −3.280782E−01 A18   5.768004E−02 −4.177795E−02 −1.463737E−02   2.732169E−01   5.143853E−02   7.750353E−02 A20 −5.787118E−03   4.157832E−03   1.353068E−03 −4.113839E−02 −1.166809E−02 −7.745891E−03 8th Surface 9th Surface 10th Surface 11th Surface 12th Surface 13th Surface k   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00 −6.223146E+00   4.931887E+00 −7.687491E+00 A4 −3.348945E−02 −2.010188E−02   2.949289E−02 −1.665630E−02 −5.589169E−02 −4.723849E−02 A6 −6.170453E−02 −5.785900E−02 −3.550467E−02   1.535220E−02   1.121211E−02   1.475135E−02 A8   9.977197E−02   6.757016E−02   1.275912E−02 −1.379924E−02 −6.387267E−04 −3.368824E−03 A10 −8.488299E−02 −4.637565E−02 −3.823184E−03   5.907609E−03   1.357945E−05   5.309471E−04 A12   4.140860E−02   2.056486E−02   1.091314E−03 −1.313769E−03 −8.673908E−06 −5.816102E−05 A14 −1.122189E−02 −5.900684E−03 −2.119399E−04   1.652649E−04   1.680153E−06   4.320403E−06 A16   1.282026E−03   1.048704E−03   2.393337E−05 −1.187952E−05 −1.312775E−07 −2.055932E−07 A18   4.389803E−05 −1.038350E−04 −1.426969E−06   4.541921E−07   4.812865E−09   5.618302E−09 A20 −1.545180E−05   4.343394E−06   3.489397E−08 −7.138855E−09 −6.916367E−11 −6.671705E−11

The imaging lens in Example 1 achieves a ratio of a total track length to a diagonal length of an effective image area of the image sensor of 0.62, and a F number of 1.90. As shown in Table 6, the imaging lens in Example 1 satisfies the conditional expressions (1) to (24).

FIG. 2 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), and distortion (%) of the imaging lens in Example 1. The spherical aberration diagram shows the amount of aberration at each wavelength of F-ray (486 nm), d-ray (588 nm), and C-ray (656 nm). The astigmatism diagram shows the amount of aberration at d-ray on a sagittal image surface S (solid line) and the amount of aberration at d-ray on tangential image surface T (broken line), respectively (same as FIGS. 4, 6, 8, and 10). As shown in FIG. 2, each aberration is corrected excellently.

Example 2

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Example 2 Unit mm f = 5.55 Fno = 1.90 ω(°) = 42.5 h = 5.16 TTL = 6.43 Surface Data i r d Nd νd (Object) Infinity Infinity 1 (Stop) Infinity −0.4750  2* 2.0765 0.7360 1.544 55.93 (νd1)  3* 6.0845 0.1046  4* 6.2508 0.2800 1.671 19.24 (νd2)  5* 3.9570 0.4519  6* 18.7937 0.4196 1.535 55.69 (νd3)  7* 18.5188 0.3822  8* 4.8436 0.3753 1.639 23.52 (νd4)  9* 4.6510 0.4821 10* −69.4360 0.8397 1.535 55.69 (νd5) 11* −1.9426 0.4778 12* −11.3465 0.5129 1.535 55.69 (νd6) 13* 1.9248 0.3841 14  Infinity 0.2100 1.517 64.20 15  Infinity 0.8450 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data TTL to diagonal length of effective Lens Start Surface Focal Length image area 1 2 5.439 0.62 2 4 −16.905 3 6 −5056.681 4 8 −761.492 5 10 3.721 6 12 −3.036 Aspheric Surface Data 2nd Surface 3rd Surface 4th Surface 5th Surface 6th Surface 7th Surface k −3.233871E−02   7.606351E−01   5.908790E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00 A4 −1.484647E−02 −5.186620E−02 −7.489120E−02 −2.452849E−02 −3.494410E−02 −6.649977E−02 A6   8.355385E−02   1.739400E−02   5.172956E−02   2.412961E−02 −6.433055E−02   7.246798E−02 A8 −2.547963E−01   6.098840E−03 −4.673531E−03 −1.867043E−02   2.060416E−01 −1.653900E−01 A10   4.590966E−01   1.762212E−02   4.251395E−02   2.304269E−01 −3.717962E−01   2.520674E−01 A12 −5.131648E−01 −6.722885E−02 −1.235150E−01 −5.913814E−01   3.882758E−01 −2.528821E−01 A14   3.577434E−01   8.153966E−02   1.437943E−01   7.412284E−01 −2.397268E−01   1.594535E−01 A16 −1.515697E−01 −5.085370E−02 −8.758874E−02 −5.117322E−01   8.331836E−02 −6.041682E−02 A18   3.567442E−02   1.643241E−02   2.803084E−02   1.874788E−01 −1.451456E−02   1.239756E−02 A20 −3.582816E−03 −2.185003E−03 −3.749564E−03 −2.844761E−02   1.091005E−03 −1.017247E−03 8th Surface 9th Surface 10th Surface 11th Surface 12th Surface 13th Surface k −1.553611E+00 −1.586773E+00   0.000000E+00 −6.364539E+00   5.185613E+00 −8.047554E+00 A4 −5.523255E−02 −4.043741E−02   2.635228E−02 −9.962407E−03 −6.333588E−02 −4.719555E−02 A6 −3.570030E−02 −4.305544E−02 −3.874174E−02   3.372505E−03   9.713245E−03   1.375987E−02 A8   8.545009E−02   6.850446E−02   2.129591E−02 −4.844856E−03   1.200233E−03 −3.006842E−03 A10 −8.499485E−02 −5.470318E−02 −8.301484E−03   3.014090E−03 −4.919723E−04   4.703956E−04 A12   4.772762E−02   2.687104E−02   2.124670E−03 −8.400046E−04   6.169290E−05 −5.262000E−05 A14 −1.568296E−02 −8.358567E−03 −3.304355E−04   1.261751E−04 −3.965909E−06   4.053971E−06 A16   2.748534E−03   1.594069E−03   2.993341E−05 −1.071197E−05   1.325502E−07 −2.013425E−07 A18 −1.929927E−04 −1.686053E−04 −1.449735E−06   4.872424E−07 −1.833075E−09   5.757646E−09 A20 −4.664220E−07   7.524603E−06   2.888183E−08 −9.284368E−09   0.000000E+00 −7.169899E−11

The imaging lens in Example 2 achieves a ratio of a total track length to a diagonal length of an effective image area of the image sensor of 0.62, and a F number of 1.90. As shown in Table 6, the imaging lens in Example 2 satisfies the conditional expressions (1) to (24).

FIG. 4 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), and distortion (%) of the imaging lens in Example 2. As shown in FIG. 4, each aberration is corrected excellently.

Example 3

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Example 3 Unit mm f = 5.55 Fno = 1.90 ω(°) = 42.4 h = 5.16 TTL = 6.43 Surface Data i r d Nd νd (Object) Infinity Infinity 1 (Stop) Infinity −0.4765  2* 2.0695 0.7383 1.544 55.93 (νd1)  3* 5.9928 0.1047  4* 6.4562 0.2816 1.671 19.24 (νd2)  5* 4.0462 0.4527  6* 18.2168 0.4190 1.535 55.69 (νd3)  7* 18.3422 0.4113  8* 4.3937 0.3706 1.639 23.52 (νd4)  9* 4.1993 0.4748 10* −40.6450 0.8411 1.535 55.69 (νd5) 11* −1.8906 0.4764 12* −11.2891 0.5020 1.535 55.69 (νd6) 13* 1.9085 0.3841 14  Infinity 0.2100 1.517 64.20 15  Infinity 0.8343 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data TTL to diagonal length of effective Lens Start Surface Focal Length image area 1 2 5.447 0.62 2 4 −16.956 3 6 2302.872 4 8 −578.178 5 10 3.680 6 12 −3.013 Aspheric Surface Data 2nd Surface 3rd Surface 4th Surface 5th Surface 6th Surface 7th Surface k −3.044862E−02   6.559263E−01   6.434472E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00 A4 −1.486449E−02 −5.192397E−02 −7.285507E−02 −2.715665E−02 −3.991599E−02 −7.414542E−02 A6   8.359853E−02   1.731479E−02   4.654693E−02   4.182863E−02 −4.744291E−02   8.854721E−02 A8 −2.547581E−01   6.026117E−03   8.681632E−03 −4.915365E−02   1.618143E−01 −1.785495E−01 A10   4.591043E−01   1.760693E−02   1.821012E−02   2.225246E−01 −2.719112E−01   2.421572E−01 A12 −5.131651E−01 −6.721573E−02 −9.598325E−02 −4.813381E−01   2.239197E−01 −2.182142E−01 A14   3.577432E−01   8.155421E−02   1.246424E−01   5.624335E−01 −6.718839E−02   1.233870E−01 A16 −1.515698E−01 −5.084632E−02 −7.984563E−02 −3.738868E−01 −2.428702E−02 −4.103318E−02 A18   3.567434E−02   1.642907E−02   2.644484E−02   1.341842E−01   2.160995E−02   6.965889E−03 A20 −3.582858E−03 −2.185601E−03 −3.633761E−03 −2.012320E−02 −3.859010E−03 −3.875577E−04 8th Surface 9th Surface 10th Surface 11th Surface 12th Surface 13th Surface k −2.375564E+00 −2.486870E+00   0.000000E+00 −6.053686E+00   5.100305E+00 −7.844235E+00 A4 −6.698946E−02 −4.499370E−02   2.398777E−02 −8.599449E−03 −5.454744E−02 −4.625892E−02 A6 −8.468068E−03 −4.123342E−02 −3.236278E−02   6.454813E−03   5.064694E−03   1.349516E−02 A8   3.795149E−02   6.890558E−02   1.149586E−02 −1.007169E−02   2.301154E−03 −2.991490E−03 A10 −3.082981E−02 −5.512078E−02 −1.586741E−03   5.861357E−03 −6.334468E−04   4.695067E−04 A12   9.654828E−03   2.714007E−02 −3.349984E−04 −1.624093E−03   7.120251E−05 −5.173139E−05 A14   7.197293E−04 −8.536105E−03   1.894882E−04   2.489810E−04 −4.159176E−06   3.864072E−06 A16 −1.460135E−03   1.655808E−03 −3.377424E−05 −2.186536E−05   1.174186E−07 −1.846243E−07 A18   3.946512E−04 −1.785677E−04   2.760149E−06   1.037790E−06 −7.868575E−10   5.083933E−09 A20 −3.469640E−05   8.132114E−06 −8.734650E−08 −2.077386E−08 −1.963666E−11 −6.141322E−11

The imaging lens in Example 3 achieves a ratio of a total track length to a diagonal length of an effective image area of the image sensor of 0.62, and a F number of 1.90. As shown in Table 6, the imaging lens in Example 3 satisfies the conditional expressions (1) to (24).

FIG. 6 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), and distortion (%) of the imaging lens in Example 3. As shown in FIG. 6, each aberration is corrected excellently.

Example 4

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 4.

TABLE 4 Example 4 Unit mm f = 5.53 Fno = 1.90 ω(°) = 42.5 h = 5.16 TTL = 6.43 Surface Data i r d Nd νd (Object) Infinity Infinity 1 (Stop) Infinity −0.4832  2* 2.0717 0.7389 1.544 55.93 (νd1)  3* 6.2681 0.1037  4* 7.0403 0.2870 1.671 19.24 (νd2)  5* 4.1876 0.4526  6* 17.8482 0.4135 1.535 55.69 (νd3)  7* 19.9806 0.4196  8* 4.7024 0.3557 1.639 23.52 (νd4)  9* 4.2495 0.4473 10* −86.7437 0.8696 1.535 55.69 (νd5) 11* −1.8961 0.4928 12* −9.9298 0.5004 1.535 55.69 (νd6) 13* 1.9415 0.3845 14  Infinity 0.2100 1.517 64.20 15  Infinity 0.8236 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data TTL to diagonal length of effective Lens Start Surface Focal Length image area 1 2 5.353 0.62 2 4 −16.057 3 6 292.919 4 8 −99.522 5 10 3.612 6 12 −2.993 Aspheric Surface Data 2nd Surface 3rd Surface 4th Surface 5th Surface 6th Surface 7th Surface k −2.705834E−02   1.083732E+00   7.938624E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00 A4 −1.473582E−02 −5.167774E−02 −7.142347E−02 −2.846864E−02 −4.035621E−02 −6.076427E−02 A6   8.356460E−02   1.741097E−02   3.826748E−02   6.569413E−02 −5.755716E−02   2.352940E−02 A8 −2.547388E−01   6.007293E−03   5.408608E−02 −1.885203E−01   1.897240E−01 −6.563807E−03 A10   4.590850E−01   1.761343E−02 −9.902729E−02   6.372562E−01 −3.308862E−01 −3.193347E−02 A12 −5.131673E−01 −6.718636E−02   7.465611E−02 −1.191420E+00   3.127736E−01   5.132521E−02 A14   3.577414E−01   8.155795E−02 −2.282523E−02   1.289727E+00 −1.578868E−01 −4.194668E−02 A16 −1.515709E−01 −5.085132E−02 −4.707927E−03 −8.140080E−01   3.303348E−02   2.057534E−02 A18   3.567430E−02   1.642124E−02   5.578827E−03   2.792917E−01   1.770533E−03 −5.772655E−03 A20 −3.582881E−03 −2.183043E−03 −1.196586E−03 −4.021015E−02 −1.037406E−03   7.301274E−04 8th Surface 9th Surface 10th Surface 11th Surface 12th Surface 13th Surface k −1.812132E+00 −2.860738E+00   0.000000E+00 −6.552389E+00   3.127362E+00 −7.455339E+00 A4 −6.241899E−02 −4.734165E−02   2.942258E−02 −8.416410E−03 −4.239350E−02 −4.499311E−02 A6 −3.973994E−02 −4.709438E−02 −3.617520E−02   1.142143E−02 −2.484668E−03   1.216991E−02 A8   9.667109E−02   7.683168E−02   1.179820E−02 −1.443069E−02   4.487098E−03 −2.536888E−03 A10 −9.044853E−02 −5.839284E−02 −6.808059E−04   7.550987E−03 −9.977661E−04   3.855505E−04 A12   4.708864E−02   2.702895E−02 −8.474622E−04 −2.017744E−03   1.089466E−04 −4.218955E−05 A14 −1.445247E−02 −8.026437E−03   3.165020E−04   3.084693E−04 −6.627126E−06   3.183207E−06 A16   2.422641E−03   1.489750E−03 −5.044964E−05 −2.756824E−05   2.159164E−07 −1.552975E−07 A18 −1.721026E−04 −1.559341E−04   3.897629E−06   1.350228E−06 −2.951845E−09   4.396502E−09 A20   9.073365E−07   6.968699E−06 −1.192882E−07 −2.815563E−08   0.000000E+00 −5.477229E−11

The imaging lens in Example 4 achieves a ratio of a total track length to a diagonal length of an effective image area of the image sensor of 0.62, and a F number of 1.90. As shown in Table 6, the imaging lens in Example 4 satisfies the conditional expressions (1) to (24).

FIG. 8 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), and distortion (%) of the imaging lens in Example 4. As shown in FIG. 8, each aberration is corrected excellently.

Example 5

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 5.

TABLE 5 Example 5 Unit mm f = 5.54 Fno = 1.90 ω(°) = 42.5 h = 5.16 TTL = 6.43 Surface Data i r d Nd νd (Object) Infinity Infinity 1 (Stop) Infinity −0.5210  2* 2.0616 0.7687 1.535 55.69 (νd1)  3* 6.2092 0.0953  4* 6.8961 0.3207 1.671 19.24 (νd2)  5* 4.2581 0.3980  6* 15.2696 0.4356 1.535 55.69 (νd3)  7* 20.9820 0.3842  8* 6.0621 0.4030 1.639 23.52 (νd4)  9* 5.4235 0.4931 10* 25.7623 0.8489 1.535 55.69 (νd5) 11* −2.1513 0.3654 12* −7.8713 0.6350 1.535 55.69 (νd6) 13* 1.9887 0.3211 14  Infinity 0.2100 1.517 64.20 15  Infinity 0.8184 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data TTL to diagonal length of effective Lens Start Surface Focal Length image area 1 2 5.421 0.62 2 4 −17.447 3 6 102.156 4 8 −106.850 5 10 3.752 6 12 −2.903 Aspheric Surface Data 2nd Surface 3rd Surface 4th Surface 5th Surface 6th Surface 7th Surface k −3.887271E−02   1.992300E+00 −1.510628E+00 −3.716930E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00 A4 −1.297037E−02 −4.911121E−02 −6.691162E−02 −1.930058E−02 −2.680748E−02 −6.382906E−02 A6   7.915371E−02   1.685119E−02   5.288182E−02   3.827417E−02 −1.041149E−01   7.631788E−02 A8 −2.370504E−01   5.221802E−03 −3.692956E−02 −9.309706E−02   4.312607E−01 −1.611841E−01 A10   4.200549E−01   1.578791E−02   9.044797E−02   3.580981E−01 −9.895363E−01   2.312258E−01 A12 −4.600233E−01 −6.023189E−02 −1.607803E−01 −7.156738E−01   1.346955E+00 −2.271139E−01 A14   3.143361E−01   7.172496E−02   1.588219E−01   8.038151E−01 −1.132392E+00   1.433186E−01 A16 −1.305576E−01 −4.376852E−02 −8.936101E−02 −5.188660E−01   5.768355E−01 −5.498910E−02 A18   3.012384E−02   1.391139E−02   2.727542E−02   1.804497E−01 −1.640078E−01   1.144811E−02 A20 −2.966001E−03 −1.832795E−03 −3.524579E−03 −2.614199E−02   2.020505E−02 −9.346054E−04 8th Surface 9th Surface 10th Surface 11th Surface 12th Surface 13th Surface k −1.353071E+01 −1.157501E+00   0.000000E+00 −4.259776E+00   2.412988E+00 −8.595942E+00 A4 −7.373183E−02 −6.453482E−02   2.321091E−02   3.965940E−02 −5.862821E−02 −4.099093E−02 A6   1.736727E−02 −3.680386E−03 −2.315389E−02 −2.448138E−02   6.004200E−03   9.957301E−03 A8 −1.028848E−02   1.398925E−02   9.559359E−03   1.140769E−02   3.185752E−03 −1.722808E−03 A10   1.742645E−02 −9.208628E−03 −3.375757E−03 −3.488659E−03 −9.554134E−04   2.024275E−04 A12 −2.092161E−02   3.357198E−03   7.865343E−04   6.789704E−04   1.191819E−04 −1.657980E−05 A14   1.355292E−02 −6.650824E−04 −1.053617E−04 −8.297586E−05 −7.977340E−06   8.849491E−07 A16 −4.995022E−03   6.929385E−05   7.755762E−06   6.135859E−06   2.823246E−07 −2.693578E−08 A18   9.829902E−04 −3.596396E−06 −2.838295E−07 −2.501042E−07 −4.173514E−09   3.935323E−10 A20 −7.888153E−05   8.585986E−08   3.755320E−09   4.306482E−09 −8.606000E−27 −2.237238E−12

The imaging lens in Example 5 achieves a ratio of a total track length to a diagonal length of an effective image area of the image sensor of 0.62, and a F number of 1.90. As shown in Table 6, the imaging lens in Example 5 satisfies the conditional expressions (1) to (24).

FIG. 10 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), and distortion (%) of the imaging lens in Example 5. As shown in FIG. 10, each aberration is corrected excellently.

In table 6, values of conditional expressions (1) to (24) related to Examples 1 to 5 are shown.

TABLE 6 Conditional Expressions Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 (1) f4/f −18.77 −137.30 −104.26 −18.01 −19.27 (2) (r6/|f3|) × 100 33.05 0.37 0.80 6.82 20.54 (3) r7/T3 12.10 12.67 10.68 11.21 15.78 (4) νd3 55.69 55.69 55.69 55.69 55.69 (5) r2/f1 0.99 1.12 1.10 1.17 1.15 (6) r3/r4 1.50 1.58 1.60 1.68 1.62 (7) |r9|/r10 −11.96 −35.74 −21.50 −45.75 −11.98 (8) r8/f 0.94 0.84 0.76 0.77 0.98 (9) |f3|/f 13.70 911.74 415.27 53.01 18.43 (10) |f3|/f4 −0.73 −6.64 −3.98 −2.94 −0.96 (11) r2/r6 0.22 0.33 0.33 0.31 0.30 (12) r3/f2 −0.32 −0.37 −0.38 −0.44 −0.40 (13) r5/f 2.82 3.39 3.28 3.23 2.75 (14) r6/r7 4.29 3.82 4.17 4.25 3.46 (15) r6/r11 −2.37 −1.63 −1.62 −2.01 −2.67 (16) r6/r12 14.64 9.62 9.61 10.29 10.55 (17) r6/T3 51.94 48.46 44.59 47.62 54.61 (18) r6/(T2 + D3) 29.50 21.25 21.04 23.07 25.17 (19) r8/T3 10.82 12.17 10.21 10.13 14.12 (20) r8/r11 −0.49 −0.41 −0.37 −0.43 −0.69 (21) |r9|/f 3.72 12.52 7.33 15.70 4.65 (22) r11/r12 −6.17 −5.89 −5.92 −5.11 −3.96 (23) r11/f6 3.89 3.74 3.75 3.32 2.71 (24) r11/(T4 + T5) −13.79 −11.82 −11.87 −10.56 −9.17

When the imaging lens according to the present invention is adopted to a product with the camera function, there is realized contribution to the low profile and the low F-number of the camera, and also high performance thereof.

DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

-   ST: aperture stop -   L1: first lens -   L2: second lens -   L3: third lens -   L4: fourth lens -   L5: fifth lens -   L6: sixth lens -   IR: filter -   IMG: imaging plane 

What is claimed is:
 1. An imaging lens comprising, in order from an object side to an image side, a first lens with positive refractive power, a second lens with negative refractive power, a third lens with positive or negative refractive power, a fourth lens with negative refractive power, a fifth lens with positive refractive power, and a sixth lens with negative refractive power, wherein said first lens is formed in a meniscus shape having an object-side surface being convex in a paraxial region, said second lens has an object-side surface being convex in a paraxial region, said sixth lens has an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region, and the following conditional expressions (1), (2) and (3) are satisfied: f4/f<−13.00  (1) 0.10<(r6/|f3|)×100<55.00  (2) 7.50<r7/T3<20.00  (3) where f4: a focal length of the fourth lens, f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens, r6: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the third lens, f3: a focal length of the third lens, r7: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the fourth lens, and T3: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the third lens to an object-side surface of the fourth lens.
 2. The imaging lens according to claim 1, wherein an object-side surface of said sixth lens is concave in a paraxial region.
 3. The imaging lens according to claim 1, wherein the following conditional expression (4) is satisfied: 33.00<νd3<79.00  (4) where νd3: an abbe number at d-ray of the third lens.
 4. The imaging lens according to claim 1, wherein the following conditional expression (5) is satisfied: 0.50<r2/f1<1.50  (5) where r2: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the first lens, and f1: a focal length of the first lens.
 5. The imaging lens according to claim 1, wherein the following conditional expression (6) is satisfied: 0.20<r3/r4<2.00  (6) where r3: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the second lens, and r4: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the second lens.
 6. The imaging lens according to claim 1, wherein the following conditional expression (7) is satisfied: |r9|/r10<−8.40  (7) where r9: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the fifth lens, and r10: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the fifth lens.
 7. The imaging lens according to claim 1, wherein the following conditional expression (8) is satisfied: 0.20<r8/f<1.20  (8) where r8: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the fourth lens, and f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens. 